ANIMAL CREMATORY

COMPLIANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST

INSPECTION TYPE:	ANNUAL (INS1, INS2)	☒	COMPLAINT/DISCOVERY (CI)	☐	
			RE-INSPECTION (FUI)	☐	ARMS COMPLAINT NO:        

AIRS ID#: 0951266  DATE:  6/6/2014	ARRIVE:  8:00AM	DEPART:  12:15PM

FACILITY NAME:  ORLANDO CREMATORY-COLOCATED HUMAN/ANIMAL
 
FACILITY LOCATION:		7284 Narcoossee Rd
		      
		ORLANDO    32822-5534
 
OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:   JANENE RHODES* 	PHONE:   (407)381-7474 
     Email:   janene44@hotmail.com 	Mobile:            
CONTACT NAME:    JANENE RHODES* 	PHONE:   (407)381-7474 
     Email:   janene44@hotmail.com  	Mobile:           
ENTITLEMENT PERIOD:    1/17/2013    /    1/17/2018
                                                               (effective date)        (end date)

Facility Section

PART I:  INSPECTION COMPLIANCE STATUS  (check ☑  only one box)

  ☒ IN COMPLIANCE        ☐ MINOR Non-COMPLIANCE 	☐ SIGNIFICANT Non-COMPLIANCE

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART II: ONSITE INTRODUCTORY MEETING

1.	Name(s) of facility representative(s):  Jnaene Rhodes

	Brief Notes:        

2.	Is the Authorized Representative still JANENE RHODES*? -----------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	If no, who is?:         
 	If different, did the facility provide an administrative update within 30 days? ------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☐..No
3.	Is the facility contact still JANENE RHODES*? --------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	If no, who is?:        
4.	Will facility be conducting VE test(s) during today’s inspection? ---------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	If yes, was the compliance authority notified at least 15 days in advance? ----------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No

Emissions Unit Section
3 –Animal Crematory-Animal Cremator, Model C500P

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART I: FILE REVIEW PRIOR TO INSPECTION

1.	a. Complete AC application or, if no AC permit, initial GP registration received on or 
		after August 30, 1989? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	b. If yes, were design calculations provided then to confirm a sufficient volume in the 
		secondary chamber combustion zone to provide for at least a 1.0 second gas residence time
		at 1800 degrees Fahrenheit? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
2.	Manufacturer’s recommended capacity: 75  ☒ lbs for batch unit  ☐ lbs/hr for ram-charged unit.
3.	Crematory unit installed after February 1, 2007? ---------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
4.	Date of last inspection:      6/7/2013
5.	Past Visible Emissions (VE) tests:
	a. Was a VE test performed within each of the past 4 calendar years? ---------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	b. Has a VE test been performed yet within the current calendar year? --------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
	c. If first year of operation, was a VE test performed within 30 days of commencing
		operation? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     ☒  N/A      	☐  Yes         ☐..No
	d. Date of last VE test:     6/7/2013
	e. Was the VE test report filed with the compliance authority no later than 45 days after the test? ------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	f. Did the facility demonstrate compliance during the last VE test? ------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
          If no, what was the problem (if known)?        

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART II: VISIBLE EMISSIONS TESTING

1. Was a visible emissions test conducted by the facility for this unit during this site visit? ------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
a. Operating capacity during test?        ☒ lbs for batch unit  ☐ lbs/hr for ram-charged unit
b. Was the operating capacity greater than the manufacturer’s recommended capacity?             ----------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
c. Was the test conducted with the unit operating at a capacity that is representative of normal operations? 	☒  Yes         ☐..No
d.  Was the visible emissions test conducted according to EPA Method 9? -------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
e. The visible emission test resulted in an opacity of  0 % for the highest six minute average.
f. Did the visible emission test demonstrate compliance with the limit? -----------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
 	(5% opacity, six-minute average, except that visible emissions not exceeding 15% opacity shall be allowed for up to six minutes in any one-hour)

2. Was a visible emissions test conducted by the inspector during this site visit? -------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
a. Operating capacity during test?         ☒ lbs for batch unit  ☐ lbs/hr for ram-charged unit
b. Was the operating capacity greater than the manufacturer’s recommended capacity?             ----------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
c. Was the test conducted with the unit operating at a capacity that is representative of normal operations? 	☒  Yes         ☐..No
d.  Was the visible emissions test conducted according to EPA Method 9?                  -------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
e. The visible emission test resulted in an opacity of  0 % for the highest six minute average.
f. Did the visible emission test demonstrate compliance with the limit? -----------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
 	(5% opacity, six-minute average, except that visible emissions not exceeding 15% opacity shall be allowed for up to six minutes in any one-hour)

3. Is there any reason to ask for a special test to determine compliance with the PM and CO standards?
													☐  Yes         ☒..No
    If yes, what reason?        

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART III: MONITORING/RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

1. 	Were there any objectionable odors detected? ---------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
	An upwind/downwind survey of the facility was conducted.  The observed parameters were:
	Wind direction -          Downwind odor level detected-          Upwind odor level detected-        Scale: 1-10 (worst)

2.	Continuous Monitoring Systems  – 
a 	Is a continuous temperature monitoring system installed on each unit to record temperatures in the 
	secondary chamber in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions? -----------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
b 	Is the temperature probe properly placed, at least at the distance where the 1.0 second gas residence
	time at ☒ 1,800^1  ☐ 1,600^2 degrees was determined? -------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
                           (Application or initial notification: ^1 received on or after 8/30/89;  ^2 received before 8/30/89)

c. 	Are the following records kept on file, available for inspection, for at least the past two years?
	(1)  All temperature measurements --------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	(2)  All continuous monitoring systems, monitoring devices, and performance testing measurements; 
		monitoring system all continuous performance evaluations ----------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	(3)  All CEMS or monitoring device calibration checks  (last performed on  5/26/2014 ) ---------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	(4)  Adjustments ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	(5)  Preventive maintenance performed on systems/devices ---------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	(6)  Corrective maintenance performed on systems/devices ---------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
d.	Are the temperature charts properly documented with operator name, operator indication of
	when cremation in the primary chamber was begun, date, time, and temperature markings --------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
e.	Was the crematory unit installed after 2/1/07?  If no, skip e.(1) – (3) ---------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
		(1)  Is the crematory unit equipped and operated with a pollutant monitoring system to automatically 
		      control combustion based on continuous in-stack opacity measurement? -------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
		(2)  Is the system calibrated to restrict combustion in the primary chamber whenever any opacity 
		      exceeds 15% opacity ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
		(3)  Has the opacity measurement system been cleaned and checked for proper operation in 
		      accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance schedule? ----------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART IV: SECONDARY COMBUSTION ZONE TEMPERATURES

1.	If the application to construct was BEFORE August 30, 1989 is the:
	a.  actual operating temperature of the secondary chamber combustion zone no less than 1400^oF 
		throughout the combustion process in the primary chamber? -------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☐..No
	b.  secondary chamber combustion zone temperature equal to or greater than 1400^oF before the cremation 
		process begins in the primary chamber? -------------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☐..No
2.  If the application to construct ON or AFTER August 30, 1989 is the:
	a.  the actual operating temperature of the secondary chamber combustion zone no less than 1600^oF
		throughout the combustion process in the primary chamber? -------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	b.  secondary chamber combustion zone temperature equal to or greater than 1600^oF before the cremation 
		process begins in the primary chamber? -------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART V: ALLOWED MATERIALS

1.  Besides animal remains and, if applicable, the bedding associated with the animals and appropriate containers, 
     are any other materials, including biomedical wastes, incinerated in the unit? ------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
     If yes, what other materials?       

2. 	Do containers contain no more than 0.5 percent by weight chlorinated plastics 
	as certified by the manufacturer? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	If yes, is the certifying documentation from the manufacturer kept on file for at least 2 years from use?	☒  Yes         ☐..No

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

PART VI: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE

1.	Is the crematory unit maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications? ------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
2.	Is there a written plan onsite which addresses the operating procedures during startup,
	shutdown and malfunction? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
3.	Does the crematory allow for a visible check on the flame characteristics? ----------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	   If no, skip a. – b.
	a.  Was the flame characteristic visually checked at least once during each operating shift? --------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No
	b.  Was the flame adjusted when necessary? ---------------------------------------------------------------------	☒  Yes         ☐..No

PART VII:  EU INSPECTION COMPLIANCE STATUS  (check ☑  only one box)

  ☒ IN COMPLIANCE        ☐ MINOR Non-COMPLIANCE 	☐ SIGNIFICANT Non-COMPLIANCE

Facility Section (continued)

   (check ☑    only one box for each question)

SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES

Administrative Changes:
1. 	Were there any changes in the name, address, or phone number of the facility or authorized representative not
	associated with a change in ownership or with a physical relocation of the facility or any emissions units or
	operations comprising the facility; or any other similar minor administrative change at the facility? ----	☐  Yes         ☒..No
2.	If yes, did the facility provide written notification within 30 days of the change? ---------------------------	☐  Yes         ☐..No
New or Modified Process Equipment or Change in Ownership:
3.	Since the last registration form submittal has there been --------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
		a. Installation of any new process equipment? --------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
		b.  Alterations to existing process equipment without replacement? ------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
		c.  Replacement of existing equipment with equipment that is substantially different? --------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
		d.  A change in ownership? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☒..No
		If the any answer to 3a. – d.  is Yes , was a new registration form and the appropriate fee 
		submitted 30 days prior to the change? ---------------------------------------------------------------------	☐  Yes         ☐..No

Assefa Hailemariam								6/6/2014
_______________________________________________		___________________________________
	      Inspector’s Name (Please Print)				     Date of Inspection

								~12/31/2015
_______________________________________________		___________________________________
	            Inspector’s Signature				     Approximate Date of Next Inspection

COMMENTS:      EPD inspector Assefa Hailemariam met with Janene Rhodes, R.O., and Stephen Sidelinger, Crematory Repair Specialist, and Randy Brgant, V.E. reader from AI Environmental Consulting Services, on June 6, 2014 to audit the annual compliance visible emission test and records review of the facility.  A facility walk-through was conducted to observe operating conditions and records review was conducted. This facility is a crematory for humans and small animals. The facility has three human cremation units (EUs 001,002, and 004) and one animal cremation unit (EU003). Mr. Sidelinger was onsite to ensure the units were operating properly and stated he performed the annual maintenance on the units on 5/26/2014. EU003 is a single animal cremation unit located in a separate red-colored building operating at capacity of 100 lbs/hr bag of puppies.  No plastic containers are used during the cremation process and the observed opacity was 0.0%.  The emission unit was operating at or above the required temperature of 1600 degrees Fahrenheit.  No leaks were observed during our walk-through of the facility and areas were clean.   The facility appears to be in good operating condition at this time and no objectionable odors noticed.